Changing the face of fever of unknown origin in Egypt: a single hospital study.

Infections remain the most frequent cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in developing countries. Some cases of fever remain a mystery and patients are discharged without knowing the cause. Prehospital healthcare facilities vary between countries, and even within the same country. FUO was first described in 1961 by Petersdorf and Beeson when they established the three criteria that define FUO: a minimum measured temperature of 38.3 C, febrile states occurring on several occasions over a period of at least three weeks, and a minimum of one week of investigations being required.1 The modern definition of FUO is based on modifications of these criteria taking into account four specific patient subtypes: classic, nosocomial, immunedeficient (neutropenic), and HIVassociated FUO.2,3 We outlined changes in causes of classic FUO according to the latest definition and compare the causes with those of a previous study conducted at the same hospital in 1974.4 We retrospectively reviewed 374 adult patients with FUO admitted to the Abbassia Fever Hospital under the definition outlined by Durack and Street (1991).5 Data were obtained from admission files. The patient population comprised 217 (58%) male patients, with a mean age of 40.2 ± 14.5 years. Further, 240 patients (64.2%) lived in urban areas, while 134 (35.8%) lived in rural areas. A continuous pattern of fever was found in 211 patients (58.3%), while 58 patients (16%) presented with a remittent pattern, and 87 patients (23.2%) showed intermittent fever symptoms. Six patients (1.6%) had relapsing fever. Blood cultures grew Gram-negative organisms in only nine cases (2.4%) and Gram-positive in eight cases (2.1%). Also, in urine cultures Gram-negative organisms were dominant including E. coli, Klebsiella and Enterobacter while Gram-positive cocci were only S. aureus. With regard to the final diagnosis, 248 patients (66.3%) were diagnosed with an infection etiology for FUO. Of these patients, 46 had cytomegalovirus infection (CMV). Among the non-infection patients, 49 (13.1%) were categorized in the miscellaneous group, and 29 (7.8%) were discharged without a final diagnosis (Table 1) Table 1 – Final diagnosis in the studied population.